Earlier than Dancing With the Stars kicked off its 28th season, ABC had hinted that some “format tweaks” had been coming down the pike — and plenty of a viewer breathed a sigh of reduction.
The tweaks would have been a welcome addition to any cycle, actually: After 14 years on the air, DWTS wanted just a little tune-up, controversy however. However the modifications appeared particularly essential within the wake of Bobby Bones’ Season 27 victory, which left a big swath of the present’s followers aggravated weak dancer had gained the Mirrorball trophy, whereas some frontrunners didn’t even attain the finale.
And but, now that we’ve bid adieu to Season 28 — maybe an much more polarizing cycle than the one which preceded it — it’s time to name a spade a spade: Dancing’s new format failed to repair the present’s issues.
I’m particularly referencing the brand new judges’ save, which allowed Len Goodman, Carrie Ann Inaba and Bruno Tonioli to decide on which of the underside two couples would go house every week. Surprising eliminations have occurred on DWTS for years, however the judges’ save appeared designed to forestall that, permitting them to guard a robust duo that may in any other case go house prematurely.
However when the present launched this twist, it was assuming that the weakest dancers would additionally get the least votes from America, paving the way in which for piece-of-cake choices from the judges. And that didn’t occur. As a substitute, we bought the baffling success of ex-White Home press secretary Sean Spicer, who bought sufficient votes to snag sixth place (!) regardless of no seen enchancment week over week.
It’s no secret that DWTS is usually a reputation contest, rewarding well-liked contestants (or contestants who’re giving it the ol’ faculty attempt) over those that dance properly. However I’m nonetheless of the opinion that it shouldn’t be — and I’m not alone in that. In a latest TVLine ballot, 44 % of readers mentioned they usually vote for the very best and/or highest-scored dancers, whereas 22 % usually present help for individuals who are enhancing every week. Solely 11 % mentioned they vote for probably the most likable contestants, no matter their talent, whereas 16 % are inclined to rally behind the superstar they already acknowledged.
Plus, the present additionally appears to need the strongest dancers to win. Anytime a frontrunner goes house too quickly — like Season 28 hopefuls Sailor Brinkley-Cook dinner or Kate Flannery — the judges discover it “irritating.” Hosts Tom Bergeron and Erin Andrews are surprised. The studio viewers boos! And if the present didn’t worth expertise over reputation, why introduce the judges’ save in any respect? Why not simply let the house viewers name the photographs?
But when the present actually desires to maintain the very best dancers, the judges’ save isn’t sufficient — not when a weak contestant like Spicer can nonetheless get by on America’s votes, although he’s hardly the one newbie to outlive on fan help alone. If the present is renewed for Season 29, maybe the judges’ scores have to make up a much bigger fraction of the ultimate outcomes. Or, on the danger of getting lambasted by the studio viewers, the judges could merely want to attain dancers extra harshly in the event that they’re not enhancing. (In spite of everything, there’s no world through which Spicer ever deserved sevens, is there?)
DWTS actually will get kudos for making an attempt one thing new; the judges’ save was an thrilling addition to Season 28, even when it didn’t have the specified impact. But when the present really desires to reward the very best of the very best (and it appears to need that!), a much bigger and bolder change must step into the highlight.